Update 08/06: Intel published an additional note on Monday, confirming which SKUs are covered by the program. The full list of SKUs has been added to the article below, but it's essentially the 13600K/14600K and above – all of Intel's high-TDP desktop parts using the Raptor Lake B0 die.


Capping off an extensive (and expensive) week for Intel, the company has also announced that they are taking additional steps to address the ongoing chip stability issues with desktop Raptor Lake chips – the 13th and 14th Generation desktop Core processors. In order to keep owners whole, Intel will be extending the warranty on retail boxed Raptor Lake chips by two years, bringing the cumulative warranty for the chips to five years altogether.

This latest announcement comes as Intel is still in the process of preparing their major Raptor Lake microcode update, which is designed to mitigate the issue (or rather, further damage) by fixing the elevated voltage bug in their existing microcode that has led to the issue in the first place. That microcode update remains scheduled for mid-August, roughly a couple of weeks from now.

But until then – and depending on how quickly the update is distributed, even afterwards – there is still the matter of what to do with Raptor Lake desktop chips that are already too far gone and are consequently unstable. Intel’s retail boxed Raptor Lake chips ship with a 3 year warranty, which given the October 2022 launch date, would have the oldest of these chips covered until October of 2025 – a bit over a year from now. And while the in-development fix should mean that this is plenty of time to catch and replace any damaged chips, Intel has opted to take things one step further by extending the chips’ warranty to five years.

Overall, this is much-needed bit of damage control by Intel to restore some faith in their existing Raptor Lake desktop processor lineup. Even with the planned microcode fix, it remains unclear at best about what the long-term repercussions of the voltage bug is, and what it means for the lifespan of still-stable chips that receive the fixed microcode. In the best-case scenario, an extended warranty gives Raptor Lake owners a bit more peace of mind, and in a worst-case scenario, they’re now covered for a couple of years longer if the chip degradation issues persist.

One important thing to note, however, is that the extended warranty will only apply to boxed processors, i.e. Intel’s official retail chips. Intel’s loose chips that are sold by the tray to OEMs and certain distributors – commonly referred to as “tray” processors – are not covered by the extended warranty. While Raptor Lake tray processors do technically come with a three-year warranty of their own, Intel does not provide direct, end-user warranty service for these chips. Instead, those warranties are serviced by the OEM or distributor that sold the chip.

With the bulk of Intel’s chips going to OEMs and other professional system builders, Intel will undoubtedly need to settle things with those groups, as well. But with OEM dealings typically remaining behind closed doors, it’s unlikely we’ll hear about just what is agreed there. Regardless, whatever Intel does (or doesn’t do) to assuage OEMs and distributors, those groups will remain responsible for handling warranty claims for tray chips.

Finally, it should be noted that while today’s announcement outlines the two-year warranty extension, it doesn’t deliver the full details on the program. Intel expects to release more details on the extended warranty program “in the coming days.”

Intel’s full statement is below:

Intel is committed to making sure all customers who have or are currently experiencing instability symptoms on their 13th and/or 14th Gen desktop processors are supported in the exchange process. We stand behind our products, and in the coming days we will be sharing more details on two-year extended warranty support for our boxed Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors.

In the meantime, if you are currently or previously experienced instability symptoms on your Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop system:
  • For users who purchased systems from OEM/System Integrators – please reach out to your system manufacturer’s support team for further assistance.
  • For users who purchased a boxed CPU – please reach out to Intel Customer Support for further assistance.
At the same time, we apologize for the delay in communications as this has been a challenging issue to unravel and definitively root cause.
-Intel Community Post

On Monday, Intel published an additional post outlining the specific SKUs covered by the extended warranty program. As the voltage/instability issues are thought to only affect high-TDP chips using Intel's Raptor Lake B0 die, which was used for both the 13th Gen and 14th Gen Core processors, the extended warranty program is also being setup to cover those processors specifically. In other words, only chips that are capable of being affected by the issue are receiving the extended warranty.

The rest of Intel's messaging is essentially unchanged from last week, telling customers of boxed processors to contact Intel directly, while tray processor owners need to contact their retailer/OEM.

Following Intel’s earlier announcement regarding two (2) year warranty extension – from date of purchase, up to a maximum of five (5) years - on Intel Core 13th/14th desktop processors, please see below for additional details on the program. Intel Core 13th/14th Gen Desktop Boxed/Tray CPUs

The following processors are covered by the warranty extension:

 
Processor Number
13th Generation Intel Core 14th Generation Intel Core
i9-13900KS i9-14900KS
i9-13900K i9-14900K
i9-13900KF i9-14900KF
i9-13900F i9-14900F
i9-13900 i9-14900
i7-13700K i7-14700K
i7-13700KF i7-14700KF
i7-13790F i7-14790F
i7-13700F i7-14700F
i7-13700 i7-14700
i5-13600K i5-14600K
i5-13600KF i5-14600KF

Warranty extension applies to new & previously purchased processors, if they are one of the Intel Core 13th/14th Gen SKUs listed above. This warranty coverage applies to all customers globally.

Standard warranty process and terms apply – which you can review here: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000024255/processors.html.

For users who are or have previously experienced instability symptoms on their Intel Core 13th/14th Gen Desktop processors and need to initiate the exchange process:
  • Boxed Processors – please contact Intel Customer Support for further assistance.
  • Tray Processors – please contact your place of purchase for further assistance.
  • OEM/System Integrator Intel Core 13th/14th Gen-powered desktop system – please contact your system manufacturer for further assistance.
If customers have experienced these instability symptoms on their 13th and/or 14th Gen desktop processors but were unsuccessful in prior RMAs we ask that they reach out to Intel Customer Support for further assistance and remediation.

We appreciate your patience with this process and will continue to share updates relating to the Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processor instability issue.
-Intel Community Post (08/05/2024)

Additional Details on Via Oxidation Issue

Separately, Intel’s community team also posted a brief update on the via oxidation issue that, although distinct from the current Raptor Lake instability issues, came into question at roughly the same time. Intel has previously stated that that issue is unconnected to the ongoing stability issues, and was fixed back in 2023. And this latest update offers a few more details on just what that manufacturing issue entailed.

The Via Oxidation issue currently reported in the press is a minor one that was addressed with manufacturing improvements and screens in early 2023.

The issue was identified in late 2022, and with the manufacturing improvements and additional screens implemented Intel was able to confirm full removal of impacted processors in our supply chain by early 2024. However, on-shelf inventory may have persisted into early 2024 as a result.

Minor manufacturing issues are an inescapable fact with all silicon products. Intel continuously works with customers to troubleshoot and remediate product failure reports and provides public communications on product issues when the customer risk exceeds Intel quality control thresholds.
-Intel Community Post
Comments Locked

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • ballsystemlord - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    Nice move, Intel.
  • [email protected] - Sunday, August 4, 2024 - link

    Yes. Nice move Intel. You just boosted the price of AMD products just as I was looking to buy them. Great job.
  • wrkingclass_hero - Saturday, August 3, 2024 - link

    Meanwhile, intel's warranties process is horrible. According to a new article on Tom's Hardware, intel are trying to convince customers that chips sold at Amazon and Microcenter are fake. If you try to RMA on to them, they will redirect you to return them to the shop you bought them from, and if you still try to go ahead with the RMA: “We do not disclose our investigation practices. If you believe your products are valid and wish to proceed with a return merchandise authorization (RMA), we can create one. However, if the products fail the validation process, the units will be retained and confiscated, and no replacements or refunds will be provided.”

    You get 2 more years of this. No thanks, you bums.
  • TEAMSWITCHER - Saturday, August 3, 2024 - link

    Do you think Intel should be forced to warranty service fake CPUs? I agree that Intel should be forced to prove the chips are indeed fake, but if they are, then it is a Microcenter and Amazon problem .. not an Intel problem.
  • yacoub35 - Saturday, August 3, 2024 - link

    Who actually makes a "fake" CPU? Let alone that looks and performs just like an Intel CPU and has the same flaw that would elicit a customer return via RMA? Seems more like gaslighting legit customers, hoping to discourage warranty returns.
  • shadowjk - Sunday, August 4, 2024 - link

    I can understand fake SD cards, because they're a commodity bulk product and you can just change the ID and print a new label.. But how does counterfeiting a CPU work?...
  • boozed - Sunday, August 4, 2024 - link

    And even then, relabelling a CPU doesn't make it a counterfeit if it still came out of an Intel facility.

    However it's noteworthy that the quoted statement doesn't use the words "fake" or "counterfeit" or anything definite as that would be boring. It says "invalid", whatever Intel has decided that means this week.

    The cynic in me decodes that as "if we made your broken CPU but it's not what you thought it was (and then said it was on the RMA form), we're keeping it."
  • boozed - Sunday, August 4, 2024 - link

    I should add that I don't know what shenanigans are possible with relabelling of modern CPUs so I'm making no assumptions about that.
  • QueBert - Tuesday, August 6, 2024 - link

    Amazon can be iffy for getting fake products if you're not paying attention and it's a 3rd party seller. But Microcenter? To me that sounds like Intel just looking for an excuse to not have to deal with an RMA. Outside of Microcenter what are the retail computer stores you can even buy an Intel CPU at? Best Buy is the only major one I can think of, at least in America.

    And I don't follow online tech shops, Mwave used to be good, no idea if they still are. I know a lot of people say to avoid Newegg. So where the hell is a person supposed to buy a noncounterfit Intel CPU? And Amazon will be fine if you're buying directly from Amazon and not a 3rd party seller.

    Intel sucks, Asus sucks, MSI sucks, Gigabytye sucks, Newegg sucks. Are there any good companies left here besides AMD & Asrock? And since I don't follow the news, both of those might suck too. I'm glad I bought a 12th gen before this shit storm, I won't need to upgrade for at least another 5 years lol.

    By then I hope all of this is worked out, hopefully there will still be good tech companies out there.
  • abufrejoval - Tuesday, August 6, 2024 - link

    I guess quite a few people, who believe it's a great way to get a good CPU cheap, by sending in a dead piece of trash...

    A dead CPU is much easier to fake than a marginally working one and investigating something that is made to resemble a defective CPU in depth is a significant effort when this is essentially a new process no one has ever designed nor imagined to operate (temporarily) at scale.

    These sort of news come from an organization that has been hit by such forgeries. I don't think Intel is trying to be extra mean here, just trying to tell any new would-be forgers that they're not willing to make it all that easy.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now