Many people lost faith in planar tlc after samsung's 840 evo fiasco. Yes, they've fixed it, but planar TLC ended up with a bad reputation overall. Unless the Trion 100 is dirt cheap, I think that it is gonna be very tough to sell.
19nm TLC NAND with the aim set for 15nm later this year? Color me crazy but when Samsung had problems even with 21nm TLC NAND who are the prospective customers for this? Well, Samsung don't admit it but you are welcome to read this and proove me wrong: http://www.techspot.com/article/997-samsung-ssd-re...
They only admitted to problems with the 19nm TLC used in the 840 EVO, not the 21nm used in the regular 840... It just seems to be too few electrons for keeping a stable product. I mean one conforming to JEDEC standards with 1 year of data longlivity with no power applied for 1 year after the TBW counter has reached 100%?
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
4 Comments
Back to Article
redzo - Tuesday, June 2, 2015 - link
Many people lost faith in planar tlc after samsung's 840 evo fiasco. Yes, they've fixed it, but planar TLC ended up with a bad reputation overall. Unless the Trion 100 is dirt cheap, I think that it is gonna be very tough to sell.NA1NSXR - Tuesday, June 2, 2015 - link
Not really. 850 EVO still sells like hotcakes.benzosaurus - Tuesday, June 2, 2015 - link
The 850 EVO has TLC V-NAND: it's not planar, so the process is larger (and thus doesn't have the same endurance problems.)Per Hansson - Tuesday, June 2, 2015 - link
19nm TLC NAND with the aim set for 15nm later this year?Color me crazy but when Samsung had problems even with 21nm TLC NAND who are the prospective customers for this?
Well, Samsung don't admit it but you are welcome to read this and proove me wrong: http://www.techspot.com/article/997-samsung-ssd-re...
They only admitted to problems with the 19nm TLC used in the 840 EVO, not the 21nm used in the regular 840...
It just seems to be too few electrons for keeping a stable product. I mean one conforming to JEDEC standards with 1 year of data longlivity with no power applied for 1 year after the TBW counter has reached 100%?