Good and logical move, I think. It will add to the reputation of Futuremark benchmarks and perhaps allow for more controlled testing of both the software and hardware. I wonder if we would some day see a UL performance rating on the box every CPU and GPU sold?
I'm sure conspiracy nuts will start in about how this is all part of some 9/11, illuminati scheme. #ULuminati
Many AMD and Nvidia graphics cards are already certified by UL, but not specifically for performance - it's for soem other category of products. I don't know if that means for electrical safety or something else, but they are certified. This includes everything from TV tuners to Radeons, Tegras, 3D cards and tablet GPU's.
I think UL might be looking at things like automotive devices as well, where accuracy and performance could have an impact on safety, e.g. your GPS doesn't update properly because it's too slow, giving you incorrect directions. I'm very interested in seeing what sort of additional benchmarks we get from Futuremark going forward. :-)
How does that tie into Futuremark tho? Most of that stuff you mention doesn't run Android (yet), unless Futuremark has been testing all sorts of embedded devices that I'm not aware of...
Seems like a very odd marriage to me, most of the things I'd like to see an independent by-the-numbers outfit testing on devices like phones aren't things that Futuremark really benches...
I'm alluding to the sorta test that a scant few resources like Anandtech have provided over the years, e.g. battery life, radio performance, read/write performance etc.
Now, if they're gonna move Futuremark in that direction, that'd be absolutely wonderful... I'd shit unicorns if I could avoid reading one more phone/tablet review that sums up battery life as "it'll get you thru a day".
How bizzarre. UL exists to ensure that products meet minimum safety levels such that those products do not create a risk of damage to property or person. UL exists because insurance companies require certain products to be tested at a regulatory agency.
I don't see any safety hazards being solved with this purchase. So their gameplan must be simply to branch into optional test services (as opposed to regulated/mandatory testing) in order to somehow boost their "not for profit" income stream.
I'm not sure if they certify non US products... I imagine you don't live in the US, otherwise you would've had to have seen the UL label on just about anything electrical.
They seem to have offices all over the world, German wiki says they have one headquarter and 2 offices in Germany. But I have never heard of them here. I guess our local TÜV is more widespread, but maybe UL Europe is more important for B2B stuff? I don't know. :D
As others have said they are all over the world.... Even a lot of electronics made in Germany ect. are sold in the U.S. thus the need for them having global offices.
I don't intend to troll, but I'd liki to share with you that the first word that came to my mind when I read this article's title was "madonion". I'm getting old.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
13 Comments
Back to Article
nathanddrews - Friday, November 7, 2014 - link
Good and logical move, I think. It will add to the reputation of Futuremark benchmarks and perhaps allow for more controlled testing of both the software and hardware. I wonder if we would some day see a UL performance rating on the box every CPU and GPU sold?I'm sure conspiracy nuts will start in about how this is all part of some 9/11, illuminati scheme. #ULuminati
designerfx - Friday, November 7, 2014 - link
Many AMD and Nvidia graphics cards are already certified by UL, but not specifically for performance - it's for soem other category of products. I don't know if that means for electrical safety or something else, but they are certified. This includes everything from TV tuners to Radeons, Tegras, 3D cards and tablet GPU's.JarredWalton - Friday, November 7, 2014 - link
I think UL might be looking at things like automotive devices as well, where accuracy and performance could have an impact on safety, e.g. your GPS doesn't update properly because it's too slow, giving you incorrect directions. I'm very interested in seeing what sort of additional benchmarks we get from Futuremark going forward. :-)Impulses - Friday, November 7, 2014 - link
How does that tie into Futuremark tho? Most of that stuff you mention doesn't run Android (yet), unless Futuremark has been testing all sorts of embedded devices that I'm not aware of...Seems like a very odd marriage to me, most of the things I'd like to see an independent by-the-numbers outfit testing on devices like phones aren't things that Futuremark really benches...
I'm alluding to the sorta test that a scant few resources like Anandtech have provided over the years, e.g. battery life, radio performance, read/write performance etc.
Now, if they're gonna move Futuremark in that direction, that'd be absolutely wonderful... I'd shit unicorns if I could avoid reading one more phone/tablet review that sums up battery life as "it'll get you thru a day".
Houdani - Friday, November 7, 2014 - link
How bizzarre. UL exists to ensure that products meet minimum safety levels such that those products do not create a risk of damage to property or person. UL exists because insurance companies require certain products to be tested at a regulatory agency.I don't see any safety hazards being solved with this purchase. So their gameplan must be simply to branch into optional test services (as opposed to regulated/mandatory testing) in order to somehow boost their "not for profit" income stream.
Mikemk - Friday, November 7, 2014 - link
To be honest, I've never heard of UL.Impulses - Friday, November 7, 2014 - link
I'm not sure if they certify non US products... I imagine you don't live in the US, otherwise you would've had to have seen the UL label on just about anything electrical.sr1030nx - Friday, November 7, 2014 - link
They have a branch up in Canada called ULC, does the same safety stuff.Death666Angel - Saturday, November 8, 2014 - link
They seem to have offices all over the world, German wiki says they have one headquarter and 2 offices in Germany. But I have never heard of them here. I guess our local TÜV is more widespread, but maybe UL Europe is more important for B2B stuff? I don't know. :D*kjm - Saturday, November 8, 2014 - link
As others have said they are all over the world.... Even a lot of electronics made in Germany ect. are sold in the U.S. thus the need for them having global offices.euler007 - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link
Probably because you buy more computers than underground tanks.velanapontinha - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link
I don't intend to troll, but I'd liki to share with you that the first word that came to my mind when I read this article's title was "madonion". I'm getting old.JarredWalton - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link
Yeah, I don't know why they didn't keep that name -- almost like someone said "MadOnion isn't very marketable." Hahaha