I've had a poor experience with their SSD's (both the S510 and SX900), but ADATA memory has always been reliable for me, right up there with gskill and Crucial. I've been running a DDR3 1333 kit in my media center since 2010 and its on 24/7.
I've still got my S510 and it works like a charm. Besides the usual sandforce related issues. But i dont give bad credit to adata for that, since they can't do much about it.
They should do what everyone else is doing and stop using Sandforce. Marvell and Indilinx (Barefoot) are available to third-party's and have historically been more reliable. Anybody still using Sandforce in modern drives is sacrificing reliability for performance and price (because LSI licensing is cheap)
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
3 Comments
Back to Article
Samus - Friday, August 22, 2014 - link
I've had a poor experience with their SSD's (both the S510 and SX900), but ADATA memory has always been reliable for me, right up there with gskill and Crucial. I've been running a DDR3 1333 kit in my media center since 2010 and its on 24/7.hojnikb - Friday, August 22, 2014 - link
I've still got my S510 and it works like a charm. Besides the usual sandforce related issues. But i dont give bad credit to adata for that, since they can't do much about it.Samus - Saturday, August 23, 2014 - link
They should do what everyone else is doing and stop using Sandforce. Marvell and Indilinx (Barefoot) are available to third-party's and have historically been more reliable. Anybody still using Sandforce in modern drives is sacrificing reliability for performance and price (because LSI licensing is cheap)