I have to say, i picked up an Actiontec powerline kit on a whim a few months ago and i'm using it to provide ethernet to my direcTV box for ondemand content. It's been absolutely rock solid in my house, and the sending and receiving units are not on the same breaker. I don't know what kind of throughput i'm actually getting, but it has no trouble getting DirecTV's 1080p24 ondemand content through the pipe. I'm glad to see this tech really get foothold.
I have to agree. I was going to help my buddy wire his new house with CAT6, but after looking at the time and energy required I asked him to try the TP-LINK TL-PA511 to connect his two main tech/entertainment rooms. It was just too damn easy! I thought there might be an issue with the outlets being on separate circuits, but it didn't impact anything that we could tell. Plenty of speed for transferring large files and streaming all the audio and video he needs. He's since added a few more to other rooms in the house. I honestly can't see the downside of these things... from the perspective of simple home use.
I know! It's surprising how solid powerline stuff works. I have a Trendnet kit that hasn't ever needed a reboot and it transfers a real 9MB/second, plenty for streaming anything.
Home powerline networking is pretty pointless now that we've left the bad old days of Wireless-G. With a good Wireless-AC router and adapters you can get a wired-equivalent experience over a large house, and we're on 5Ghz now so crowded 2.4Ghz spectrum isn't an issue. If you're going to make an investment in networking hardware, it just makes much more sense in most cases to invest in good WiFi equipment that will help all of your devices.
In an ideal enviroment you would be right But if you're living in an old building I found powerline very useful. If only to get an access point to the other side of an 120 cm thick load bearing wall.
Or in a condo building, there are a lot of Wi-Fi products fighting for airspace. If the one I bought hadn't already been wired up with CAT6 I would have picked up one of these kits. There is definitely a need there, but the applications are fairly slim.
While that was true for 2.4Ghz on Wireless-N and previous standards, Wireless-AC mandates the 5Ghz band so you'll have channels to yourself even in densely populated areas. Improvements related to signal reflections, beamforming, and SDMA mean much better performance even in larger houses with thicker walls. Overall this means that for most applications where powerline networking would previously have been considered Wireless-AC is a better choice. Obviously you will only get a decent experience with decent-quality hardware.
Not really. I'm already sitting with a RT-AC68, with a 2013 RMBP (hint; both use the same wifi controller). While the throughput is good in the rooms directly adjacent to where the router is, the other rooms still tend to dip into rather low capacities, and I do need to switch to 2.4GHz N in some rooms. That was the case even back when the AC68 was somewhat buggy and 2.4ghz 40mhz didn't work - now with twice the bandwidth that cutoff distance is much shorter.
Yes that is running with a 3-stream 80MHz bandwidth (most ship only 2 stream); though as the building is located where we can call 'in the middle of nowhere' theres nothing really to interfere with either network.
802.11AC might be fine for three typical US household... But here in Puerto Rico houses are usually solid concrete and the wall penetration for 5GHz just isn't there. I recently bought an RT-AC68 and while it definitely improved upon my ancient WRT54G it still wasn't enough to cover the entirety of a modest 4 bedroom/2 bathroom house, and I dropped it dead center of the house.
This is a 1 story house too btw... Signal penetration past rooms like bathrooms/kitchen is still poor (guessing it's the combo of piping plus concrete plus dense metal shelving in some closets), never mind the patio etc.
Not that I'd advocating power line networking mind you, maybe I should give it a try, for now I just set one router up at one end of the house and another one at the opposite end, interconnected by the Cat6 cable I had already hung along the main corridor years ago.
Yeah I run 5GHz in a small one bedroom apartment and its fine for that...just. I've even swapped one of the three 5dB antennas for a 9dB and through one brick wall you get a 50% drop.
In a large brick built house...no way.
Sometimes you just have to use a piece of wire, even if it powers the kettle too!
Give it time. I live in a condo hi-rise that has a population larger than some cities, and there are already a ton of people on the 5GHz band. Even 24 non-overlapping channels in 10 years might be too few.
Unfortunately ac's wider channels are heavily undermining 5ghz's promise. Most of the world has 3 non-overlapping 2.4ghz channels. 5ghz licensing is really messy at the global level (read in wikipedia if you're interested). In the US for 9/n wifi we currently have enough spectrum for 12 40mhz or 25 20mhz channels which did allow for lots of people to run 5ghz wifi in apartment buildings without stomping all over each others traffic and lead geeks to sing its praises a few yeras ago; we only have 6 80mhz channels available. When next generation AC devices show up with support for 160 mhz channels we'll only have 2 available; a 5mhz slice between the last 2 80 mhz channels is reserved for a different use.
The FCC is considering reallocating two additional blocks 5ghz spectrum for wifi; if both are approved the numbers would jump to 9/4 channels at 80/160mhz wide. They're facing a lot of pushback on one of the two blocks from the auto industry; that spectrum is currently allocated for use by future car to car communication systems (wifi is too slow to connect at highway speeds); if that one is denied while the other one is approved we'd expand to 8/3 channels.
..., and did you see how fast they hacked the RING DOORBELL? Easy as logging on in a Starbucks network using your laptop. An AC power source to a DC circuit also requires a ballast based AC-DC converter to get the DC 12V to power these gadgets, so they are not ALL 100% wireless installations. A HD-PLC circuit can carry 100Mbps+ across the house as well as provide power on the same line (AC PowerLine, Cable, or twisted pairs inside an RJ-45 all work). Some cases this is THE preferred methodology. MegaChips HD-PLC and Video-Over-Coax solutions can do this, and achieve above speeds with 1Km-->2Km reach, and also provide the line power provisioning (injector and POL) in a small low cost solution. Supports Layer 7, IGMP, Multicast, Multi-Hop, and star network configurations. Easy to apply, east to optimize for particular needs. Many people are using in both industrial and residential applications today.
I have never had powerline ethernet working reliably in my house. I have tried twice with about 1 year in between. The first time I got below 5Mbps, and the second time was better but didn't go above 20Mbps unless I put the adapters in the same power bar(200Mbps at most). The connection dropped pretty often. On the other hand, wifi is much better: I have set up a pair of D-Link router(DIR-850)/bridge(DAP-1565). I get about 100-200Mbps using iperf3. It's not as stable as wired ethernet connection, but much faster than powerline.
If by "power bar" you mean a power strip then you were doing it wrong. They are supposed to be plugged directly to the wall with nothing in between. It says so in the instructions.
You need to plug it directly in the wall... If it still doesn't work, you might need to change the breaker by choosing a different brand more friendly to powerline ethernet.
Some brand of electric box just doesn't work if I remember well, so the solution isn't 100% certain to work anyway.
In any case, even if the speed isn't as great as wireless AC, the sheer reliability of powerline ethernet is at least a thousand time better. I'd go wireless for browsing the Net, but online gaming, streaming, telnet, vpn, etc., are all better with powerline. I prefer to sacrifice some speed and have a 100% uptime on my internet link instead of having a small bump in speed and see my things slow or disconnect twice an hour... It all depends on what you wanna do.
I have an old 3 story house with a seperate garage and seperate finished shed. These devices make sense for me in connecting those seperate buildings that are out of WiFi range yet connected by electric circuit. I haven't spluged just because I haven't need the connection enough to through the cash behind it, but if I had money in excess I would just do it. If I had home automation, I would consider it for the basement because WiFi just doesn't get down there enough. I have a 3x3 Asus N router - RT66U or something like that.
I'm very interested in these gigabit level speeds? Who is actually getting these? I've never seen more than ~40 Mbit and i've tried many powerline kits!
The problem with Powerline is it's not scalable cheaply. You can't have mobile devices attach to it easily and in a big house it's a lot easier to have Wireless repeaters. I can throw up multiple AC wireless routers and cover the entire house and all mobile devices support atleast N. By next year almost all mobile devices will have AC support and streaming Hidef is a thing of the past.
Pity, as one standard that included coax as well would have been very nice. There are tons of variables for a home network, and just because AC WiFi is good enough for some people in some dwellings for some use cases does not mean it is good enough everywhere. Even with AC, I've had to set up a MoCA network in the past for HTPC usage (using cheap Verizon FiOS routers off eBay). For some applications, especially in large houses, I'd much rather have a rock solid 100Mb MoCA connection than AC.
And my experience with Powerline has been piss poor. It was a few years ago in a new construction house, but even in the same room on different outlets I could only manage a few Mb during testing. On different floors where I actually needed it was a total joke. I was getting single digit kB/s with constantly dropped connections. This was with the Belkin "Gigabit" Powerline kit shortly after it came out. Updating the firmware to the latest version didn't help at all. Hopefully comparability has improved since then. Just make sure you buy your Powerline kit from somewhere that makes returns easy, as it might be the best thing since sliced bread where you live, or it may not work for squat. Coax networking is much closer to a sure thing.
Powerline deffinitely has its place. Its sadly still a lot slower than most wireless in a lot of applications, but it deffinitely fits in to the "fast enough" catagory in most cases. It's also great where wireless is really congested, or not an option.
I am looking at it as a stop gap measure for a few years to add coverage to my property. On a little over an acre and a large part of our backyard isn't covered. It'd be nice to have some wifi coverage over there sometimes and neither of the inside routers can make it. A shed isn't too far away, and there is (nominally) power running to the shed. I just have to reconnect it (former owner cut the powerline just inside the garage...for no apparent reason), slap on a couple of powerline adapters and hook-up the spare WAP I happen to have laying around and I should have sufficient coverage then.
Its not outdoor rated, but it'll be out of direct exposure and I'll probably pull it late fall and reinstall early spring as the area won't be used during the really cold months anyway. I don't need much, extending my wireless network with something that can handle 15-30Mbps would be more than sufficient. Its a lot better than the LTE speeds we can get on our phones "round these parts", and no cell data use then (and laptops and tablets can also then have a connection).
In a few years when I raze the shed and build a studio in its place, I have to redo the electric for 240V and I'll lay fiber out to it at the same time for a true, proper high speed connection, but its a great band-aid for now and prevents me from needing to spend the time and effort running 150ft of trench for fiber right now and wireless extenders are not an option.
I've noticed a few people mention horrible issues and at least one mention "and it was with a new build house". I haven't confirmed this for 100%, but as far as I know Arc Fault Circuit Interupters cause SERIOUS problems for Homeplug networking. I don't know if this only applies if your homeplug device happens to be on an AFCI breaker, or if simply having one present in your breaker box is enough to screw it up.
I think international code was updated aroud 2000 or so to mandate the installation of AFCI for bedroom spaces and living spaces. The most likely places you'll be installing homeplugs.
So actually older builders are the best place for homeplug, not newer builds.
Also whole house surge protectors can also skew things.
Jabin Jay Trapp said, Wireless networking mileage may very, any signal strength drop and throughput drops considerably. with powerline networking, this is a moot point. Do some throughput tests with less then excellent signal strength and the facts will appear before your eyes
John Egan, president of HomeGrid - I have come to respect Anandtech over the years for clear, concise, and accurate reporting that is unbiased. But with this article I have to admit, I am scratching my head. Is Ganesh an independent reporter here or someone with a pro-HomePlug agenda? The article is so pro-HomePlug even Qualcomm has reposted it, almost as if this is an ad for them. I am sure it is not, but it is not in line with what I expect from Anandtech for fairness, accuracy and unbiased reporting. Let me explain: 1. The use of the wording in the first text block: "but I heard from industry sources that none of these announcements have resulted in any shipping products yet" is as vague a reporting job as I have ever seen. Who were these sources? Qualcomm? The president of HomePlug? Who are the industry sources? Unattributed sources can mean anything. And anyone that may have an agenda so their statements should be suspect. This is a serious failure of a reporter to deliver on clean reporting. 2. Ganesh says he went to CES to catch up on the state of the powerline industry. Hmmm. I was at the HGF booth nearly every minute the event was open and did not meet Ganesh nor was it reported to me he came by. Possibly, because G.hn covers all wires and not just powerlines, Ganesh felt he did not need to include G.hn in his visits, yet he reports on it? I am concerned over such reporting when a reporter misses a main actor in the topic and acts as if he has the latest information. Seems to be a mis-statement to say he caught up with the state of the powerline communications industry if he missed the HGF booth. Again, and unfortunately, placing Ganesh as suspect here. 3. HomePlug AV2 has about 8 "profiles" of which only one is MIMO, which helps HP claim to have G.hn speeds (notice they do not mention they have achieved G.hn noise robustness). But many HomePlug systems claiming to be "AV2" do not have MIMO in them, just extended frequency ranges or some other "under the hood" refinements that bring them closer to G.hn. To fall for the claim that AV2 is only MIMO and that is catches up to G.hn means Ganesh sat with HomePlug spin doctors, and did not get an unbiased set of information points. Again, a very sad day for Anandtech, as I see it. Promoting skewed reality is not stating facts. 4. MIMO is great, where there are three wire circuits in the home. Ganesh seems to think this is everywhere globally, showing a possible US-centric mindset that "if it is here in US then it must be elsewhere." A very unfortunate mindset. A poor mindset for a reporter, as well. AV2 with MIMO may help HP claim parity with G.hn, but not in reality. Ganesh is invited to speak with me anytime and I will give him an accurate set of statements he can verify and see that HGF does not rely on spin doctoring to deliver positive statements. 5. There are numerous reasons why G.hn out-classes HomePlug of any flavor. Ganesh should do a real job and research and come back with unspun facts to do your readers a real service. 6. If Ganesh had come by the HGF booth he would have seen public demonstrations of: A single network showing Interop of 6 systems vendors and 3 silicon vendors all in one high demand network where one node was feeding 6 others streaming HD IPTV at 10-15 Meg each. Something you do not see from others, a MIMO demo showing interop of vendors and SISO and MIMO modes - showing we continue to outpace the other guys- and publicly, a demo of G.hn over coax with HomePNA (which could have been MoCA or RF video) showing the nature of G.hn coexistence, and a demo of Ultra-HD (4K) video over G.hn powerline (a CES first, but one we have already shown in Taiwan) in one network right next door to another network - a scenario that the other guys cannot do, regular IPTV or U-HD, as HomePlug technology finds it problematic to work over powerlines in an appartment building where cross-interference will effect service. G.hn is "invisible" to itself in these conditions. Oh, and if Ganesh wishes to verify this, the ITU standards for G.hn are publicly available and he could see what I am saying is right from the standard as to neighboring G.hn networks. HomeGrid is in business to promote G.hn globally, and one commitment the market has and will continue to see form us is accuracy. So, check us out and feel free to engage us, we look forward to the opportunity to set things straight, with statements you can independently verify as fully accurate.
We have interacted on the phone before and I have had the chance to be on multiple phone briefings with you over the last few years. In the CES visits prior to 2014, I had been invited by one or the other HomeGrid forum member to check out the G.hn offerings. In 2011, it was Sigma Designs. Last year, it was Marvell. I have in fact been very very bullish on G.hn in my coverage over the last three years.
To set the record straight, this year, HomePlug invited me to a briefing, which I did take up. There was no invite from any of the HomeGrid members (unlike the previous years). Despite this, I took it upon myself to check what HomeGrid had been up to at CES 2014, and I did make note of those in the concluding section.
As for the interoperability demos being shown at CES -- HomePlug had those in their meeting rooms, but I didn't cover those either. However, I did cover G.hn's interoperability demos last year.
Addressing your concerns one by one:
I have been part of the AnandTech editorial team since March 2010. I don't have any agenda -- either pro-HomePlug or anti-HomeGrid :: I report based on facts.
2. If there are 'shipping products' based on G.hn - please let me know and I would definitely love to set the record straight right here. Part of this piece is based on my briefing with HomePlug at CES, but the statement you find issue with is from my interaction with networking product vendors -- I talked to Netgear, ZyXEL, D-Link and TRENDnet - None of them are planning any G.hn products in their portfolio in the near future.
As for AV2 and MIMO - The QCA7500 supports MIMO and both TP-LINK and TRENDnet confirmed to me that they will support MIMO in their products (which were on display at CES).
Please take a look at my previous pieces on G.hn vs. HomePlug here:
For three years, I have been covering HomeGrid / G.hn and presenting a balanced view -- In fact, it may even seem that G.hn has been given a long pole despite the absence of any shipping products.
I have multiple HomePlug products at home. Last year, I tried to arrange for a G.hn powerline kit to test in-house from Marvell -- there was no follow up. As I specified in the beginning of this post, if there are any shipping G.hn products, please let me know the model number / market in which it is being shipped (along with deployment numbers). Of course, I would love to talk to the service providers themselves and have independent confirmation of the numbers -- After all, we like to report facts here.
Hi Ganesh, Unfortunatyely, the reply post was not flagged to me in email and I am only now checking your site to see if you had replied.
I find it interesting that you list two of the companies that were inthe HGF Booth as part of the multi-vendor IOP demo that I mentioned. Both ZyXEl and D-Link were in the demo.
It seems that you made a determination with out all of the facts and, yes, I will address inside HGF any reasons why you did nto have an invite to our booth, as you say. However, as a good reporter, you are responsible to go get a complete set of facts, especially as you stated in your first sentence: "I have been making it a point to catch up on the state of the powerline networking industry every CES, and this year was no different." As you did not go out and get the state of the industry, you went and got a small view of it from HomePlug it seems. And, if you spoke to the vendor reps to HomePlug at their booth you may have gotten a very limited view of the market and their companies' views, as they may not be inthe same Business Units as those involved in G.hn. And, they may have been uncomfortable to say they were offering competing products while situated inside the HomePlug closed booth.
If you had only walked by our open booth you would have seen the public demos and the names of the companies in the demos well displayed: AcBel, D-Link, Enable-IT, ARRIS, ZyXel, and Comtrend as I recall. Hard to say that ZyXEL and D-Link are uninvolved in G.hn designs and products when they are prominently displayed in live demos with finished products, No?
I recommend that you reach out to me privately and we can take this offline. I will give you facts and statements you can verify and that will not claim something that is not factual as fact.
As you said, you like to report facts here, please do so then and make sure not to set up a misleading article through an incomplete gathering of information.
Is there a list of G.hn products anywhere? I have done cursory searches and cannot find anything. I am very interested in testing some products and would appreciate your guidance.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
29 Comments
Back to Article
Hyperlite - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
I have to say, i picked up an Actiontec powerline kit on a whim a few months ago and i'm using it to provide ethernet to my direcTV box for ondemand content. It's been absolutely rock solid in my house, and the sending and receiving units are not on the same breaker. I don't know what kind of throughput i'm actually getting, but it has no trouble getting DirecTV's 1080p24 ondemand content through the pipe. I'm glad to see this tech really get foothold.nathanddrews - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
I have to agree. I was going to help my buddy wire his new house with CAT6, but after looking at the time and energy required I asked him to try the TP-LINK TL-PA511 to connect his two main tech/entertainment rooms. It was just too damn easy! I thought there might be an issue with the outlets being on separate circuits, but it didn't impact anything that we could tell. Plenty of speed for transferring large files and streaming all the audio and video he needs. He's since added a few more to other rooms in the house. I honestly can't see the downside of these things... from the perspective of simple home use.Samus - Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - link
I know! It's surprising how solid powerline stuff works. I have a Trendnet kit that hasn't ever needed a reboot and it transfers a real 9MB/second, plenty for streaming anything.LtGoonRush - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
Home powerline networking is pretty pointless now that we've left the bad old days of Wireless-G. With a good Wireless-AC router and adapters you can get a wired-equivalent experience over a large house, and we're on 5Ghz now so crowded 2.4Ghz spectrum isn't an issue. If you're going to make an investment in networking hardware, it just makes much more sense in most cases to invest in good WiFi equipment that will help all of your devices.simonpschmitt - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
In an ideal enviroment you would be right But if you're living in an old building I found powerline very useful. If only to get an access point to the other side of an 120 cm thick load bearing wall.Flunk - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
Or in a condo building, there are a lot of Wi-Fi products fighting for airspace. If the one I bought hadn't already been wired up with CAT6 I would have picked up one of these kits. There is definitely a need there, but the applications are fairly slim.LtGoonRush - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
While that was true for 2.4Ghz on Wireless-N and previous standards, Wireless-AC mandates the 5Ghz band so you'll have channels to yourself even in densely populated areas. Improvements related to signal reflections, beamforming, and SDMA mean much better performance even in larger houses with thicker walls. Overall this means that for most applications where powerline networking would previously have been considered Wireless-AC is a better choice. Obviously you will only get a decent experience with decent-quality hardware.DarkXale - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
Not really. I'm already sitting with a RT-AC68, with a 2013 RMBP (hint; both use the same wifi controller). While the throughput is good in the rooms directly adjacent to where the router is, the other rooms still tend to dip into rather low capacities, and I do need to switch to 2.4GHz N in some rooms. That was the case even back when the AC68 was somewhat buggy and 2.4ghz 40mhz didn't work - now with twice the bandwidth that cutoff distance is much shorter.Yes that is running with a 3-stream 80MHz bandwidth (most ship only 2 stream); though as the building is located where we can call 'in the middle of nowhere' theres nothing really to interfere with either network.
Impulses - Saturday, January 18, 2014 - link
802.11AC might be fine for three typical US household... But here in Puerto Rico houses are usually solid concrete and the wall penetration for 5GHz just isn't there. I recently bought an RT-AC68 and while it definitely improved upon my ancient WRT54G it still wasn't enough to cover the entirety of a modest 4 bedroom/2 bathroom house, and I dropped it dead center of the house.Impulses - Saturday, January 18, 2014 - link
This is a 1 story house too btw... Signal penetration past rooms like bathrooms/kitchen is still poor (guessing it's the combo of piping plus concrete plus dense metal shelving in some closets), never mind the patio etc.Not that I'd advocating power line networking mind you, maybe I should give it a try, for now I just set one router up at one end of the house and another one at the opposite end, interconnected by the Cat6 cable I had already hung along the main corridor years ago.
jabber - Monday, January 20, 2014 - link
Yeah I run 5GHz in a small one bedroom apartment and its fine for that...just. I've even swapped one of the three 5dB antennas for a 9dB and through one brick wall you get a 50% drop.In a large brick built house...no way.
Sometimes you just have to use a piece of wire, even if it powers the kettle too!
otherwise - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
Give it time. I live in a condo hi-rise that has a population larger than some cities, and there are already a ton of people on the 5GHz band. Even 24 non-overlapping channels in 10 years might be too few.lurker22 - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
Have to disagree. I LOVE wired connections as the latency with wireless is really irritating. Maybe AC is better, but my 5ghz N still has it.DanNeely - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
Unfortunately ac's wider channels are heavily undermining 5ghz's promise. Most of the world has 3 non-overlapping 2.4ghz channels. 5ghz licensing is really messy at the global level (read in wikipedia if you're interested). In the US for 9/n wifi we currently have enough spectrum for 12 40mhz or 25 20mhz channels which did allow for lots of people to run 5ghz wifi in apartment buildings without stomping all over each others traffic and lead geeks to sing its praises a few yeras ago; we only have 6 80mhz channels available. When next generation AC devices show up with support for 160 mhz channels we'll only have 2 available; a 5mhz slice between the last 2 80 mhz channels is reserved for a different use.The FCC is considering reallocating two additional blocks 5ghz spectrum for wifi; if both are approved the numbers would jump to 9/4 channels at 80/160mhz wide. They're facing a lot of pushback on one of the two blocks from the auto industry; that spectrum is currently allocated for use by future car to car communication systems (wifi is too slow to connect at highway speeds); if that one is denied while the other one is approved we'd expand to 8/3 channels.
Current/proposed new US channels:
http://specmap.sequence-omega.net/blog/wp-content/...
smartconnectivity - Monday, May 9, 2016 - link
..., and did you see how fast they hacked the RING DOORBELL? Easy as logging on in a Starbucks network using your laptop. An AC power source to a DC circuit also requires a ballast based AC-DC converter to get the DC 12V to power these gadgets, so they are not ALL 100% wireless installations. A HD-PLC circuit can carry 100Mbps+ across the house as well as provide power on the same line (AC PowerLine, Cable, or twisted pairs inside an RJ-45 all work). Some cases this is THE preferred methodology. MegaChips HD-PLC and Video-Over-Coax solutions can do this, and achieve above speeds with 1Km-->2Km reach, and also provide the line power provisioning (injector and POL) in a small low cost solution. Supports Layer 7, IGMP, Multicast, Multi-Hop, and star network configurations. Easy to apply, east to optimize for particular needs. Many people are using in both industrial and residential applications today.edwpang - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
I have never had powerline ethernet working reliably in my house. I have tried twice with about 1 year in between. The first time I got below 5Mbps, and the second time was better but didn't go above 20Mbps unless I put the adapters in the same power bar(200Mbps at most). The connection dropped pretty often.On the other hand, wifi is much better: I have set up a pair of D-Link router(DIR-850)/bridge(DAP-1565). I get about 100-200Mbps using iperf3. It's not as stable as wired ethernet connection, but much faster than powerline.
robbertbobbertson - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
If by "power bar" you mean a power strip then you were doing it wrong. They are supposed to be plugged directly to the wall with nothing in between. It says so in the instructions.TheThirdRace - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
You need to plug it directly in the wall... If it still doesn't work, you might need to change the breaker by choosing a different brand more friendly to powerline ethernet.Some brand of electric box just doesn't work if I remember well, so the solution isn't 100% certain to work anyway.
In any case, even if the speed isn't as great as wireless AC, the sheer reliability of powerline ethernet is at least a thousand time better. I'd go wireless for browsing the Net, but online gaming, streaming, telnet, vpn, etc., are all better with powerline. I prefer to sacrifice some speed and have a 100% uptime on my internet link instead of having a small bump in speed and see my things slow or disconnect twice an hour... It all depends on what you wanna do.
eanazag - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
I have an old 3 story house with a seperate garage and seperate finished shed. These devices make sense for me in connecting those seperate buildings that are out of WiFi range yet connected by electric circuit. I haven't spluged just because I haven't need the connection enough to through the cash behind it, but if I had money in excess I would just do it. If I had home automation, I would consider it for the basement because WiFi just doesn't get down there enough. I have a 3x3 Asus N router - RT66U or something like that.bleomycin - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
I'm very interested in these gigabit level speeds? Who is actually getting these? I've never seen more than ~40 Mbit and i've tried many powerline kits!vision33r - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
The problem with Powerline is it's not scalable cheaply. You can't have mobile devices attach to it easily and in a big house it's a lot easier to have Wireless repeaters. I can throw up multiple AC wireless routers and cover the entire house and all mobile devices support atleast N. By next year almost all mobile devices will have AC support and streaming Hidef is a thing of the past.Bob Todd - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
Pity, as one standard that included coax as well would have been very nice. There are tons of variables for a home network, and just because AC WiFi is good enough for some people in some dwellings for some use cases does not mean it is good enough everywhere. Even with AC, I've had to set up a MoCA network in the past for HTPC usage (using cheap Verizon FiOS routers off eBay). For some applications, especially in large houses, I'd much rather have a rock solid 100Mb MoCA connection than AC.And my experience with Powerline has been piss poor. It was a few years ago in a new construction house, but even in the same room on different outlets I could only manage a few Mb during testing. On different floors where I actually needed it was a total joke. I was getting single digit kB/s with constantly dropped connections. This was with the Belkin "Gigabit" Powerline kit shortly after it came out. Updating the firmware to the latest version didn't help at all. Hopefully comparability has improved since then. Just make sure you buy your Powerline kit from somewhere that makes returns easy, as it might be the best thing since sliced bread where you live, or it may not work for squat. Coax networking is much closer to a sure thing.
azazel1024 - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
Powerline deffinitely has its place. Its sadly still a lot slower than most wireless in a lot of applications, but it deffinitely fits in to the "fast enough" catagory in most cases. It's also great where wireless is really congested, or not an option.I am looking at it as a stop gap measure for a few years to add coverage to my property. On a little over an acre and a large part of our backyard isn't covered. It'd be nice to have some wifi coverage over there sometimes and neither of the inside routers can make it. A shed isn't too far away, and there is (nominally) power running to the shed. I just have to reconnect it (former owner cut the powerline just inside the garage...for no apparent reason), slap on a couple of powerline adapters and hook-up the spare WAP I happen to have laying around and I should have sufficient coverage then.
Its not outdoor rated, but it'll be out of direct exposure and I'll probably pull it late fall and reinstall early spring as the area won't be used during the really cold months anyway. I don't need much, extending my wireless network with something that can handle 15-30Mbps would be more than sufficient. Its a lot better than the LTE speeds we can get on our phones "round these parts", and no cell data use then (and laptops and tablets can also then have a connection).
In a few years when I raze the shed and build a studio in its place, I have to redo the electric for 240V and I'll lay fiber out to it at the same time for a true, proper high speed connection, but its a great band-aid for now and prevents me from needing to spend the time and effort running 150ft of trench for fiber right now and wireless extenders are not an option.
azazel1024 - Friday, January 17, 2014 - link
I've noticed a few people mention horrible issues and at least one mention "and it was with a new build house". I haven't confirmed this for 100%, but as far as I know Arc Fault Circuit Interupters cause SERIOUS problems for Homeplug networking. I don't know if this only applies if your homeplug device happens to be on an AFCI breaker, or if simply having one present in your breaker box is enough to screw it up.I think international code was updated aroud 2000 or so to mandate the installation of AFCI for bedroom spaces and living spaces. The most likely places you'll be installing homeplugs.
So actually older builders are the best place for homeplug, not newer builds.
Also whole house surge protectors can also skew things.
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/lanwan-basic...
Some AFCIs work okay, others cause serious problems.
[email protected] - Monday, January 20, 2014 - link
Jabin Jay Trapp said, Wireless networking mileage may very, any signal strength drop and throughput drops considerably. with powerline networking, this is a moot point. Do some throughput tests with less then excellent signal strength and the facts will appear before your eyesoldmanegan - Tuesday, January 21, 2014 - link
John Egan, president of HomeGrid -I have come to respect Anandtech over the years for clear, concise, and accurate reporting that is unbiased. But with this article I have to admit, I am scratching my head. Is Ganesh an independent reporter here or someone with a pro-HomePlug agenda?
The article is so pro-HomePlug even Qualcomm has reposted it, almost as if this is an ad for them. I am sure it is not, but it is not in line with what I expect from Anandtech for fairness, accuracy and unbiased reporting.
Let me explain:
1. The use of the wording in the first text block: "but I heard from industry sources that none of these announcements have resulted in any shipping products yet" is as vague a reporting job as I have ever seen. Who were these sources? Qualcomm? The president of HomePlug? Who are the industry sources? Unattributed sources can mean anything. And anyone that may have an agenda so their statements should be suspect. This is a serious failure of a reporter to deliver on clean reporting.
2. Ganesh says he went to CES to catch up on the state of the powerline industry. Hmmm. I was at the HGF booth nearly every minute the event was open and did not meet Ganesh nor was it reported to me he came by. Possibly, because G.hn covers all wires and not just powerlines, Ganesh felt he did not need to include G.hn in his visits, yet he reports on it? I am concerned over such reporting when a reporter misses a main actor in the topic and acts as if he has the latest information. Seems to be a mis-statement to say he caught up with the state of the powerline communications industry if he missed the HGF booth. Again, and unfortunately, placing Ganesh as suspect here.
3. HomePlug AV2 has about 8 "profiles" of which only one is MIMO, which helps HP claim to have G.hn speeds (notice they do not mention they have achieved G.hn noise robustness). But many HomePlug systems claiming to be "AV2" do not have MIMO in them, just extended frequency ranges or some other "under the hood" refinements that bring them closer to G.hn. To fall for the claim that AV2 is only MIMO and that is catches up to G.hn means Ganesh sat with HomePlug spin doctors, and did not get an unbiased set of information points. Again, a very sad day for Anandtech, as I see it. Promoting skewed reality is not stating facts.
4. MIMO is great, where there are three wire circuits in the home. Ganesh seems to think this is everywhere globally, showing a possible US-centric mindset that "if it is here in US then it must be elsewhere." A very unfortunate mindset. A poor mindset for a reporter, as well. AV2 with MIMO may help HP claim parity with G.hn, but not in reality. Ganesh is invited to speak with me anytime and I will give him an accurate set of statements he can verify and see that HGF does not rely on spin doctoring to deliver positive statements.
5. There are numerous reasons why G.hn out-classes HomePlug of any flavor. Ganesh should do a real job and research and come back with unspun facts to do your readers a real service.
6. If Ganesh had come by the HGF booth he would have seen public demonstrations of: A single network showing Interop of 6 systems vendors and 3 silicon vendors all in one high demand network where one node was feeding 6 others streaming HD IPTV at 10-15 Meg each. Something you do not see from others, a MIMO demo showing interop of vendors and SISO and MIMO modes - showing we continue to outpace the other guys- and publicly, a demo of G.hn over coax with HomePNA (which could have been MoCA or RF video) showing the nature of G.hn coexistence, and a demo of Ultra-HD (4K) video over G.hn powerline (a CES first, but one we have already shown in Taiwan) in one network right next door to another network - a scenario that the other guys cannot do, regular IPTV or U-HD, as HomePlug technology finds it problematic to work over powerlines in an appartment building where cross-interference will effect service. G.hn is "invisible" to itself in these conditions. Oh, and if Ganesh wishes to verify this, the ITU standards for G.hn are publicly available and he could see what I am saying is right from the standard as to neighboring G.hn networks.
HomeGrid is in business to promote G.hn globally, and one commitment the market has and will continue to see form us is accuracy. So, check us out and feel free to engage us, we look forward to the opportunity to set things straight, with statements you can independently verify as fully accurate.
ganeshts - Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - link
Mr. Egan,We have interacted on the phone before and I have had the chance to be on multiple phone briefings with you over the last few years. In the CES visits prior to 2014, I had been invited by one or the other HomeGrid forum member to check out the G.hn offerings. In 2011, it was Sigma Designs. Last year, it was Marvell. I have in fact been very very bullish on G.hn in my coverage over the last three years.
To set the record straight, this year, HomePlug invited me to a briefing, which I did take up. There was no invite from any of the HomeGrid members (unlike the previous years). Despite this, I took it upon myself to check what HomeGrid had been up to at CES 2014, and I did make note of those in the concluding section.
As for the interoperability demos being shown at CES -- HomePlug had those in their meeting rooms, but I didn't cover those either. However, I did cover G.hn's interoperability demos last year.
Addressing your concerns one by one:
I have been part of the AnandTech editorial team since March 2010. I don't have any agenda -- either pro-HomePlug or anti-HomeGrid :: I report based on facts.
2. If there are 'shipping products' based on G.hn - please let me know and I would definitely love to set the record straight right here. Part of this piece is based on my briefing with HomePlug at CES, but the statement you find issue with is from my interaction with networking product vendors -- I talked to Netgear, ZyXEL, D-Link and TRENDnet - None of them are planning any G.hn products in their portfolio in the near future.
As for AV2 and MIMO - The QCA7500 supports MIMO and both TP-LINK and TRENDnet confirmed to me that they will support MIMO in their products (which were on display at CES).
Please take a look at my previous pieces on G.hn vs. HomePlug here:
http://anandtech.com/show/4147/ghn-silicon-emerges...
http://anandtech.com/show/4882/ghn-gains-momentum-...
http://anandtech.com/show/6662/ghn-and-homeplug-he...
For three years, I have been covering HomeGrid / G.hn and presenting a balanced view -- In fact, it may even seem that G.hn has been given a long pole despite the absence of any shipping products.
I have multiple HomePlug products at home. Last year, I tried to arrange for a G.hn powerline kit to test in-house from Marvell -- there was no follow up. As I specified in the beginning of this post, if there are any shipping G.hn products, please let me know the model number / market in which it is being shipped (along with deployment numbers). Of course, I would love to talk to the service providers themselves and have independent confirmation of the numbers -- After all, we like to report facts here.
oldmanegan - Saturday, January 25, 2014 - link
Hi Ganesh,Unfortunatyely, the reply post was not flagged to me in email and I am only now checking your site to see if you had replied.
I find it interesting that you list two of the companies that were inthe HGF Booth as part of the multi-vendor IOP demo that I mentioned. Both ZyXEl and D-Link were in the demo.
It seems that you made a determination with out all of the facts and, yes, I will address inside HGF any reasons why you did nto have an invite to our booth, as you say. However, as a good reporter, you are responsible to go get a complete set of facts, especially as you stated in your first sentence: "I have been making it a point to catch up on the state of the powerline networking industry every CES, and this year was no different." As you did not go out and get the state of the industry, you went and got a small view of it from HomePlug it seems. And, if you spoke to the vendor reps to HomePlug at their booth you may have gotten a very limited view of the market and their companies' views, as they may not be inthe same Business Units as those involved in G.hn. And, they may have been uncomfortable to say they were offering competing products while situated inside the HomePlug closed booth.
If you had only walked by our open booth you would have seen the public demos and the names of the companies in the demos well displayed: AcBel, D-Link, Enable-IT, ARRIS, ZyXel, and Comtrend as I recall. Hard to say that ZyXEL and D-Link are uninvolved in G.hn designs and products when they are prominently displayed in live demos with finished products, No?
I recommend that you reach out to me privately and we can take this offline. I will give you facts and statements you can verify and that will not claim something that is not factual as fact.
As you said, you like to report facts here, please do so then and make sure not to set up a misleading article through an incomplete gathering of information.
dougandh - Wednesday, January 29, 2014 - link
Mr. Egan,Is there a list of G.hn products anywhere? I have done cursory searches and cannot find anything. I am very interested in testing some products and would appreciate your guidance.
Regards,
Douglas