Comments Locked

49 Comments

Back to Article

  • KLC - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    You say the UI of the Notion Ink is colourful but later you say the transreflective display is monochromatic. You call it the Adam but the photo gallery calls it the Eden.
  • zebrax2 - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Adam is the tablets name while Eden is the name of the UI.
  • vol7ron - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Why are all the tablets so small? Why can't they introduce something slightly bigger than the iPad. I'd like an 8x11.5 screen.
  • softdrinkviking - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - link

    i think the issue is that larger tablets are a bit too cumbersome when you actually start using them.
    the bigger, heavier size ones are uncomfortable to hold for long periods of time, and they don't really prop-up well by themselves like a laptop.

    they probably did test groups and people whined about the bigger ones. maybe they figured over 10" might as well be a laptop.
  • metafor - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    I believe the Notion Ink is a dual-mode display. When in reflective mode (e-reader), it's monochromatic. When it's back-lit, it functions as an LCD.
  • tipoo - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Its a hybrid display, its a colour LCD like the iPad and other tablets, but it can also become a e-ink display like the Kindle.
  • Shadowmaster625 - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Just because a few million dumb yuppies can afford to throw away $500+ on a tablet does not mean there is a market for a bunch of cheap knockoffs that just happen to not be cheap at all. These things are way way WAY too expensive for what they are. They offer nothing above and beyond what you can get with an ipod touch. If they cannot bring it to market for $149 or lower it is a waste of time. If they think they're gonna get away with charging $500 I hope they all go out of business.
  • HibyPrime1 - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    It doesn't matter if they're too expensive for what they are, thats pretty much how all new things in the tech world start out. Remember before the iPad was released everyone was expecting it to be $800-1200?

    Besides, tablets are a legitimate alternative to a laptop for those that aren't using it as a productivity tool. These tablets have productivity apps, but really thats kind of a misnomer with these things.

    I can't for the life of me understand why you say they don't offer anything above and beyond an iPod touch? It literally takes a half second glance to see that they are very different form factors. The screen size is the main selling point of a tablet vs ipod touch/smart phone.

    With all that said, I don't think this form factor will last all that long. I think Motorola has the right idea with the Atrix, in my opinion that is the future of mobile computing.
  • Shadowmaster625 - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    They are bigger than an ipod but the screen resolution is the same, or less. So all you're getting for twice the price is the ability to hold it 1 foot further away. That's retarded. Anyone who spends $200 to hold something 1 foot further away needs to have their job outsourced to a monkey.
  • maxhdrm - Wednesday, February 2, 2011 - link

    Are you kidding me? It sounds like YOUR job has already been outsourced to a monkey by the lack of research you have done. I have a Velocity Micro Cruz color eReader with tablet functionality that I bought @ best buy for $99. Sure, it is only 800X600 but not that far from the Ipod touch. The Samsung Galaxy...600X1024 WSVGA, Props goes to Ipad for the one of the highest but C'mon there are plenty that will be the Ipod touch and yah it is nice to read an eBook that isn't in a 2pt font or having to scroll all over the touch.

    Moreover, while I am at it why in hell would I want something bigger than 7"? A 10" tablet is the same size as a netbook why not just sticks with a netbook for a cheaper price and way more functionality. IMO 7" is a good form factor and just because the price isn't insane doesn't mean it's crap. It’s called research. More places like fry's are putting out demos so consumers can interact with said tablets. Apple aside...EVERYONE is running android so it comes down to the "perks" that a tablets puts in, which ones you like and the openness of the tablet.

    This leads me to my biggest concern. As so many forums have posted about Samsung (mainly Verizon phones) phones running android, just how easy is it going to be to update these devices to the newest OS or is the industry "sucker punching" consumers by only allowing us to update via a newer device? Google needs to pass these updates along and ALL tablet device makers need to be allowed accessibility for OS updating.
    This should be every consumers concern otherwise they will sneek this under the radar
  • KoolAidMan1 - Thursday, February 3, 2011 - link

    You nerds are so fucking retarded and detached from reality.

    Hilarious, please keep posting.
  • kraeper - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    I can't speak for the rest of the market, but I agree on $500 being too high, and would add that the carrier contracts are the real deal-killers for me. Yes I know they can be purchased without a contract, but they're pricing them to be purchased with one. Thing is, I have a cellphone. All I would want is a tablet with wifi. If I need data access on the tablet while I'm out and about, well, that's why smartphones have hot-spot capabilities. Another 2-year contract, even if it's 'just' a $30/month data plan, is still $720 on top of the tablet cost. Yuck.

    Sure, plenty of people are too lazy to hotspot, or just figure they'll stick their tablet in their pocket and use it with Skype as their cellphone (lol) but the marketing/pricing on these right now baffles me.
  • michael2k - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Actually, at least with the iPad, you get significantly longer battery life and a slightly higer resolution than with the iPod touch for that extra $180.
  • ImSpartacus - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    If you're looking for value, grab a Nook Color. Root that bad boy and enjoy a $250 Android tablet.
  • pandemonium - Friday, January 28, 2011 - link

    So, Apple can do it, but no one else can?

    Cheap and knock-off is highly subjective and showing how little perception you've given to the article or what's within.
  • Shftup - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    I think you guys need to add a new section - Tablets (there is a sub section for every other computing catergory), especially if 2011 is the year of tablets.....
  • lazn_ - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    So what I want is a tablet with a good IR transmitter..

    One that can be used to control my home entertainment system. Say browse Netflix on it, then click a button to have my TV load that movie up.. Or with Hulu and all that.. But without having to buy into a brand (like the Panasonic).

    With an IR transmitter and GoogleTV it should be easy to implement.
  • lazn_ - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    I don't have any use for a tablet as a tablet...

    But a tablet as an interface to other devices, that I could use.
  • soydeedo - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    You might want to take a look at the Vizio offerings from CES:

    http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/05/vizio-tablet-ha...
    http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/05/vizio-phone-han...

    They both have IR transmitters and universal remote capabilities.
  • Jorgisven - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    IR Transmitter? That tech is so 90's, a la Palm Pilots. New TV's are coming wifi/internet enabled, as are blu-ray players. It's all over network now. Google TV's have apps for android to control just that. Also, Comcast has an Xfinity App that, provided you're using their HD box, you can do all that - browse on demand listings, change channels, all from an iPad (or Android Phone). It's certainly not brand specific. I have a Dynex TV (cheap Best Buy brand). Getting the XBox App for Android allows Netflix, etc. In fact, Netflix apps are all over.

    IR is old and slow, and line of sight only, and I wish Nintendo hadn't bought into it. Cloud control is where it's all headed anyway.
  • jade_angel - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    "Cloud control"? Yuck. I'd really rather not have control over my TV or set-top box mediated through some random company's servers out there in Cloudland. Hello security problems, or else massive amounts of PKI ickage to secure it.

    Now, if it's entirely within the LAN, that might be a different story. Still a potential security issue, but not to nearly the same magnitude.

    That said, I'm not convinced IR's old-and-slow nature is actually a problem for use as a TV remote (though, more bandwidth would allow unforeseen use cases). IR would also have the advantage of potentially working with existing TVs.
  • bupkus - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Maybe Logitech has just that in mind with their universal remote, perhaps broadening that to a tablet. They charge enough for their remote now anyway.
  • PeterS1 - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Thank you for the preview on Notion Ink Adam, I am very much looking forward to a in-dept review of the Adam from the industry experts whom I trust the most.
  • Kamen75 - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    The Enspert 201 tablet looks like a winner. Yes froyo is needed so let's hope it really is coming soon. I would like to see a higher resolution than 800x480 but to put that in perspective it is 133ppi, while the ipad at 9.7 inch and 1024x768 is 132ppi so text and everything else should be adequately viewable. Given it's nearly Galaxy Tab matching specs and it's $200 dollar price point this IS what a tablet should be right now. Cheap and disposable.
  • geniekid - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    "2011 is the Year of the Tablet. With all due respect to the rabbit, who would have otherwise been assigned to this year..."

    I loled.
  • melgross - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    None of these seem impressive. If it's true that a dual CPU is required for honeycomb, then any tablet that doesn't have that is already obsolete, and not worth bothering with. That seems to cut out the majority of the tablets shown at CES. We can move on.

    The Notion Ink screen also looks crappy in the photos. If it's supposed to look good in sunlight, then it's a fail.
  • Kobaljov - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Based on the experiences of the first Adam buyers, the screen is glossy, the Notion Ink offers a matte screen protector for it.

    (source: http://liliputing.com/2011/01/roundup-of-notion-in... )
  • Beenthere - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    ...they are called TOYlets. Because they are toys.
  • rpmurray - Friday, January 28, 2011 - link

    It's TABlets, not TOYlets. A toilet is something you drink from, although its a shame you forgot to flush first.
  • Enlightenment777 - Wednesday, February 2, 2011 - link

    Apphole Toilet
  • finbarqs - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    the ONLY tablet that runs Hulu NORMALLY without a hulu plus subscription is the Blackberry Playbook!

    This is shocking as well as encouraging!
  • iuqiddis - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Is there any chance of you guys reviewing the Asus EP121? It's a windows tablet and all, but it'd be great to put it through the paces as an alternative to a laptop.
  • VivekGowri - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Yeah, Asus is sending a review unit to Brian, since he's the guy who really uses inking a lot. It's actually a really interesting alternative to the 11" MacBook Air, provided you can live without a physical keyboard.
  • iuqiddis - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Awesome. Looking forward to that review.
  • TheUsual - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    I'd like to see the Pixel Qi screen on a windows tablet, if they can just find a way to get decent battery life.
  • TheUsual - Thursday, January 27, 2011 - link

    Tablets, no Rablets :)
  • rs2 - Friday, January 28, 2011 - link

    I've yet to see a single point that would make me want to buy a tablet. Basically you're getting an underpowered netbook with no keyboard, a non-standard hardware architecture that makes it unable to run most common application, and a non-standard OS that in some cases locks you into using a proprietary "app store" for all your software needs. You know, because all that software that can be freely downloaded off the Internet is not good enough for these devices, or something.

    My money is better spent elsewhere.
  • Oscarcharliezulu - Friday, January 28, 2011 - link

    Do all these tablets require you to buy all the software you need? Can I create my own apps, perhaps say like a database based app without needing to publish to an app store? Can I presume that with a win7 based tablet I can load any x86/win based Dev tool ? I've not seen any review address this requirement.
  • vision33r - Friday, January 28, 2011 - link

    Simple jailbreaking will allow you to install apps to ipad and Android requires rooting to install apps not from Market.

    Win7 tablet will run just like regular Windows.
  • Missy @ Golin - Friday, January 28, 2011 - link

    Hi Vivek, In the PlayBook segment, you mentioned strong hints from multiple parties saying that there’s a TI OMAP 4 SoC underhood. It is indeed TI's OMAP4440 processor. More details are available at TI's Mobile Momentum blog: http://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/b/mobile_momentum/archive...
  • kenyee - Friday, January 28, 2011 - link

    I'm curious how well it does at displaying photos. From the specs, it looks like it only has 256K colors when the backlight is on and I think this will be a significantly worse display compared to an IPS display like the iPad's and even the Color Nook which also uses an IPS screen...
  • ibex333 - Friday, January 28, 2011 - link

    All these tablets are irrelevant. They have already lost to the iPad before they even started selling. Why? SEVEN INCH SCREEN. Which means - sucks for reading PDFs.

    So people will keep buying iPads specifically because of the large screen, and Apple WILL NOT lower prices, because technically they are still king of the tablet market.

    Is it really so damned hard to start making 10" tablets and NOT 7" tablets?
  • JMC2000 - Monday, January 31, 2011 - link

    That's what I wonder also, does Apple own the iPad's screen manufacturer? The is almost like the iPhone vs. the World issue, everyone claims to have an iPad killer, but they lose mainly on one aspect, screen size.

    Seriously, it is like everyone is handing Apple the market... FFS!
  • Penti - Friday, February 4, 2011 - link

    I'm pretty sure that like nobody else wants to pay 200-300 dollars for LG's "iPad" screen. Many stick to simple TN-panels. There are some other good panels out there though, but 7" is totally fine. A tablet is also not a e-reader. There's separate devices for that.
  • Ylurien - Monday, January 31, 2011 - link

    I stopped reading this article after I looked up the specs on the Adam because that tablet only has 1024x600 resolution and I assume all the rest have pretty much the same or worse since Adam is the biggest tablet.

    In the day of HD video, why are manufacturers making tablets that can't even play 720p video at its native size? And where's the 64 ~ 128GB of disk space to allow all that video to fit on there?

    Why build something that's obsolete before it even goes on the market?
  • Malih - Tuesday, February 1, 2011 - link

    i suppose you should wait for Windows 7 tablet from Acer, utilizing AMD C-50 which presumably will have acceleration for H.264 playback
  • Vinny DePaul - Friday, February 4, 2011 - link

    I planned to buy an Android tablet and was going to buy Notion Ink. However, after reading countless complaints, I have changed my mind and going to buy Xoom instead. Notion Ink is good if it is hand delivered to you. The ordering process is tedious, the returning process is a horrendous, and too many defective units. I may consider Notion Ink if the quality control, ordering and return processes are improved. For a new company, they are not bad. However, I want a good tablet, not just a "not bad" tablet.
    Since I live in US, I prefer to purchase in US and be able to return products easily. The protection for international purchase is almost zero for most people.
  • alexkinsella - Tuesday, February 8, 2011 - link

    Hi Vivek,

    It’s Alex from RIM’s Social Media team, here. I’m glad you were impressed with the BlackBerry PlayBook at CES. The crowd reaction was amazing. At just under a pound, it’s easy to take anywhere. I can confirm that you’re correct: the PlayBook has a combination of the QNX based BlackBerry Tablet OS, and a TI OMAP 4430 dual-core 1GHz Cortex A9. One point of clarification: There will be a 4G/WiMax version of PlayBook available on the Sprint network this summer (this was announced at the Consumer Electronics Show in January). Please stay tuned to the Inside BlackBerry blog for the latest updates on BlackBerry PlayBook!

    Thanks!
  • tina2010 - Sunday, July 17, 2011 - link

    The touchsquid universal tv remote control tablet has a built in IR transmitter which opens up a whole world of remote control possiblities. It is a tidier solution compared to using dongles. See http://www.touchsquid.com

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now