Comments Locked

11 Comments

Back to Article

  • JayNor - Friday, August 21, 2020 - link

    Do PAM4 drivers go on the CPU chips when PCIE6 comes along?
  • PixyMisa - Friday, August 21, 2020 - link

    Yep. GDDR6X is also PAM4, so GPUs will be getting it as well. I wonder if DDR6 will also be PAM4.

    And with 224G transceivers on the way, the path is set for PCIe 8.0 and 112GB/s M.2 drives.
  • rpg1966 - Friday, August 21, 2020 - link

    "This module is set to support both 224G in a PAM4 mode (4-bits)..."

    PAM4 is 2 bits (4 levels), not 4 bits?
  • TimSyd - Saturday, August 22, 2020 - link

    Correct - PAM4 is 2 bits per symbol.

    BTW - I hate to think how much power these things guzzle.
    Doing *anything* at 112G/224G on Si is an enormous challenge and throwing power at it is pretty much the only way to move signals around on chip. 1 simple nand/inverter gate delay can be 4-6ps in 10nm FinFET & here we're talking just 8ps bit times!

    Much kudos to the Serdes engineers who made this happen.
  • back2future - Saturday, August 22, 2020 - link

    seems things are getting towards extremely fast analog to digital conversion, means DDR5 to DDR6 will need higher power envelope on top bandwidth speeds?
  • JayNor - Saturday, August 22, 2020 - link

    The Tofino 2 presentation states it has 260 lanes of 56Gb PAM4. Looks like the serdes are on a separate die than the core in their presentation diagrams.

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/16003/hot-chips-202...
  • JayNor - Saturday, August 22, 2020 - link

    This article says Intel was previously using TSMC 58G serdes chiplets with their FPGAs. I see the 112G and 224G transceivers are being built with an Intel 10nm process now. I wonder if it is the same 10nm process as used on the cpu, or if this requires separate chiplets.

    https://www.eejournal.com/article/intel-fpga-hits-...

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/p...
  • richmaxw - Sunday, August 23, 2020 - link

    This article doesn't say what form factor the transceiver is. Is it SFP or QSFP? 200-gigabit QSFP56 transceivers are already available. But a 200-gigabit SFP transceiver would be big news.
  • extide - Tuesday, August 25, 2020 - link

    It's just the logic -- there is no "connector" -- just pins on the die. You could put whatever connector you wanted, or perhaps it's just being used on a single board for chip to chip communication.
  • richmaxw - Tuesday, August 25, 2020 - link

    I see. I am a networking guy. Hence the confusion. So, would it be fair to say that this is a single lane?
  • back2future - Wednesday, August 26, 2020 - link

    for example Agilex I-Series IP shows for F-Tile
    "Transceiver channel count :- 4 channels at 116 Gbps (PAM4) / 58 Gbps (NRZ)- 16 channels at 32 Gbps (NRZ) /12 channels at 58 Gbps (PAM4) - RS & KP FEC"

    (probably one channel is two differential signal lanes, full duplex?)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now