I think one needs to take in account the size of screen which is 1/4 in using math I came up what this would be same on 4x6 in screen - which is about 15,000 to 8500.
Of course one's eye is closer than one would be at your phone
It could be both ... super-sampling is to render an image in larger resolution and then resize it (down-sampling) to the target resolution. If there's no rendering then it would not be super-sampling IMO.
Well it looks like it uses 1280×720 images internally but then outputting to 640x360.
I seen this happen on my XPS 15 2in1 when showing same window on 1920x1080 screen with laptop in 4k - even though the monitor a Samsung Curve 27 only has 1920x1080 resolution - it looks like the image was shrink - this is probably a windows 10 thing - and it might because I installed special drives for 34U88B on it.
Party like it's the mid 1990s, I guess. These sorts of near-eye monocular HUDs have been off-the-shelf products for decades. I guess selling it alongside a tiny Windows PC rather than an awful little ARM box (or just VGA cables for roll-your-own) is an improvement, but that display module is proper vintage tech.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
21 Comments
Back to Article
ಬುಲ್ವಿಂಕಲ್ ಜೆ ಮೂಸ್ - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
640 X 360 resolution.....What year is this?
69369369 - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
2018ಬುಲ್ವಿಂಕಲ್ ಜೆ ಮೂಸ್ - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
Probably streams 4K video to a backend system like Amazons new product which then sends text to this low rez headset > ARREST THAT MAN!BleepingComputer: Amazon Is Selling Facial Recognition Software to US Law Enforcement
ಬುಲ್ವಿಂಕಲ್ ಜೆ ಮೂಸ್ - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
A red dot on whoever you are looking at = Arrest Him!Yellow dot = Watch Him!
Green = Ignore that Undercover Gov't Agent
Shouldn't be too hard to program, Right China?
ಬುಲ್ವಿಂಕಲ್ ಜೆ ಮೂಸ್ - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
Just one question....Would Trumps Russian contact be Red, Yellow or Green?
trivik12 - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
Screen size is 0.26 inches. even 720pm is overkill.mode_13h - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
Physical size is irrelevant, at such distances. You need to look at the FoV it covers.mr_tawan - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link
My dump guess would be... at most 1/4 of the what an eye see.HStewart - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
I think one needs to take in account the size of screen which is 1/4 in using math I came up what this would be same on 4x6 in screen - which is about 15,000 to 8500.Of course one's eye is closer than one would be at your phone
boeush - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
"a small 0.26-inch screen featuring a 640×360 resolution that can display content with a 1280×720 resolution"Ummm... huh?
HStewart - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
I believe it is called super-samplingmode_13h - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
I would call it down-sampling or simply image scaling, but it's a bit like FSAA.close - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link
Hey, I have a FHD screen that can display *ANY* resolution as long as it's scaled to FHD.GreenReaper - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link
Mine can scale *up* as well as down! It's almost magic.mr_tawan - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link
It could be both ... super-sampling is to render an image in larger resolution and then resize it (down-sampling) to the target resolution. If there's no rendering then it would not be super-sampling IMO.HStewart - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link
Well it looks like it uses 1280×720 images internally but then outputting to 640x360.I seen this happen on my XPS 15 2in1 when showing same window on 1920x1080 screen with laptop in 4k - even though the monitor a Samsung Curve 27 only has 1920x1080 resolution - it looks like the image was shrink - this is probably a windows 10 thing - and it might because I installed special drives for 34U88B on it.
Alexvrb - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link
VSR/DSR?mode_13h - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link
"From some points of view, Toshiba’s dynaEdge AR is a realization of Microsoft’s HoloLens concept."And which points of view are those? This barely qualifies as AR, IMO. It's certainly no Hololens.
edzieba - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link
Party like it's the mid 1990s, I guess. These sorts of near-eye monocular HUDs have been off-the-shelf products for decades. I guess selling it alongside a tiny Windows PC rather than an awful little ARM box (or just VGA cables for roll-your-own) is an improvement, but that display module is proper vintage tech.Tams80 - Thursday, May 24, 2018 - link
Well, it is a Vuzix part.iranterres - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link
A $1,900 Business AR device without an API? Already dead.