Because Hynix only advertise their queue depth 1 speeds, unlike the rest which claim the speeds at the highest depth. You should read more carefully next time, it's right there in the article.
The article literally says: "but SK Hynix does not disclose queue depth and other factors". If any additional data is provided by the manufacturer, it's not mentioned in the article.
Because Hynix only advertise their queue depth 1 speeds, unlike the rest which claim the speeds at the highest depth. You should read more carefully next time, it's right there in the article.
Stop posting FUD. That is nowhere in the article, which you'd have known if you'd have actually read the damn thing. In fact the article says much the opposite (that SK Hynix DOESN'T announce the queue depth of their testing).
wow I used to read Anton's posts at KitGuru and they were fud. same deal over here. Surprised Anandtech would hire someone who got fired for posting anti AMD rubbish on another big site.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
7 Comments
Back to Article
mapesdhs - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link
Anton, the random write IOPS of these designs seems low compared to competing products; why do you reckon this might be?vladx - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link
Because Hynix only advertise their queue depth 1 speeds, unlike the rest which claim the speeds at the highest depth. You should read more carefully next time, it's right there in the article.romrunning - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link
@vladx: You bash the OP for his comment, saying he should read more carefully.However, the article says " ...(but SK Hynix does not disclose queue depth and other factors)."
It looks like you should be reading more carefully.
close - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link
The article literally says: "but SK Hynix does not disclose queue depth and other factors". If any additional data is provided by the manufacturer, it's not mentioned in the article.Read more carefully?
vladx - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link
Because Hynix only advertise their queue depth 1 speeds, unlike the rest which claim the speeds at the highest depth. You should read more carefully next time, it's right there in the article.Cooe - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link
Stop posting FUD. That is nowhere in the article, which you'd have known if you'd have actually read the damn thing. In fact the article says much the opposite (that SK Hynix DOESN'T announce the queue depth of their testing).Johntheman - Saturday, February 10, 2018 - link
wow I used to read Anton's posts at KitGuru and they were fud. same deal over here. Surprised Anandtech would hire someone who got fired for posting anti AMD rubbish on another big site.