Comments Locked

15 Comments

Back to Article

  • Michael Bay - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    But why no ecryption? Do they still treat it as an enterprise model diversifier?
  • CaedenV - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    I imagine these drives are for RAID implementation, there is little to no point to encrypting a RAID drive as there is no real data on any single drive. The encryption would be at the RAID controller level.
  • Penti - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    So where is raid controllers for PCIe/NVMe? Are any actually sold? Of course you can always do software raid and run an encrypted volume on top of that.
  • ddriver - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    Software raid makes more sense here IMO. Hardware raid is plain out silly IMO, I always use only HBA cards, no raid thanks.
  • rems - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    oooh 1.7DWPD*5years*365.25 = 4850.97TB disk life?
  • rems - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    That was for the 1.6TB the 3.2TB is put at 6848.44TWTB
  • MrSpadge - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    A few PB write endurance is normal for a big MLC enterprise drive.
  • rems - Thursday, February 9, 2017 - link

    Does intel not produce such drives or is it me not finding this info there: https://ark.intel.com/#@SolidStateDrives
  • MrSpadge - Thursday, February 9, 2017 - link

    It's a PITA to find anything on Intels website unless you already know what you're looking for. And that should be e.g. the Intel DC P3700 or DC P3600:
    http://geizhals.de/intel-ssd-dc-p3700-2tb-ssdpedmd...
    36.5 PB TBW at 2 TB capacity, using HET MLC NAND.
  • rems - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    oh they're actually giving in on their website just had to know the model!
    https://ark.intel.com/products/79621/Intel-SSD-DC-...
    a crazy 62PBW woah 17DW/D
  • creed3020 - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    Sequential speeds look low for an NVMe drive, especially one with so much capacity so there isn't a reason why the controller cannot max out its channels to the available NAND.

    Also why re-use the same branding as Seagate HDDs....I realize the overlap between DC SSDs and Surveillance hard drives isn't clear but surprised anyways.
  • MrSpadge - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    Apparently they ran out of fancy bird names.
  • ddriver - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    It has gotten quite lame, but hey, their marketing people know what impresses the idiots. Silly marketing is a reflection of silly consumers.
  • aIIergen - Sunday, February 12, 2017 - link

    skyhawk is a brand name of all-flash-array developped by skyera inc. which is bought by HGST some years ago. this means its monikar as storage brand(2012) by far predates seagate product(2016).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now