Comments Locked

12 Comments

Back to Article

  • dgingeri - Friday, December 16, 2016 - link

    2,000,000 hour MTBF? That's enterprise drive level ratings. Is that at a 24X7 duty cycle?
  • fanofanand - Friday, December 16, 2016 - link

    SSD endurance is typicaly expressed in drive writes per day. As SSDs don't "spin up" the MTBF means nothing to these drives. It's silly really. This drive is $16 less than an 850 Pro, so they will sell precisely zero to informed customers. Stupid pricing for what appears to otherwise be a decent product if you still need SATA. If the pricing was aggressive that 2TB would find a home in many PS4s I'm guessing.
  • Samus - Saturday, December 17, 2016 - link

    If anything, it actually shows how clueless ADATA is. They are a 3rd tier SSD vendor, charging tier 1 prices. They don't make controllers, NAND or firmware. They have high failure rates (I can't count how many SP500's I've mailed in) at least their warranty process is fairly quick with a 3-4 day turn around. I don't know who anybody buys their products.
  • fanofanand - Friday, December 16, 2016 - link

    Sorry for the 2nd post, but without encryption nobody would put one of these in a datacenter. This is a very consumer-focused device.
  • MrSpadge - Monday, December 19, 2016 - link

    Doesn't matter. There is no mechanical wear from startup, like in an HDD, and this thing is not getting hot (i.e. it doesn't profit from cooling cycles).
  • shabby - Friday, December 16, 2016 - link

    Nothing ultimate about sata3 speeds anymore.
  • LordanSS - Friday, December 16, 2016 - link

    This is really getting old...

    For client usage, queue depths around 1-3, you get *NO* benefit for using a M.2 PCIe SSD over a SATA3 one. Transfer and use of very large files (talking GigaBytes here) see improvement, but that's all.

    Hell, I've installed programs and games on a RAMDrive in my computer and I couldn't notice a difference between that and my 850 EVO. Maybe if I had a stopwatch going I'd detect a couple tenths of a second difference between game loads.
  • Lolimaster - Saturday, December 17, 2016 - link

    Games are not really optimized for the hyper speed of a ram drive or even an SSD even at loading.

    But yes, unless you move really huge chunks of data (100GB+), work editting 4k HD videos there's literally 0 benefit between sata ssd and nvme pci-e top of of the line SSD.
  • shabby - Monday, December 19, 2016 - link

    I take it 640k is enough memory for you too?
  • Hrel - Sunday, December 18, 2016 - link

    Why do they list a MTBF? Anton do you, or anyone else over there, know why that's even listed?
  • vladx - Sunday, December 18, 2016 - link

    Because that's the only info relevant to endurance currently in their possession?
  • MrSpadge - Monday, December 19, 2016 - link

    SSDs which are choosen appropriately for their write workload don't usually wear their flash out, but rather the controller or something else breaks at some point. An MTBF of 2 Mio hours claims ADATA is confident this won't happen to their drives too soon.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now