Comments Locked

23 Comments

Back to Article

  • Ro_Ja - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    Is this their answer against Adreno 530?
  • ddhelmet - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    I think their answer to Adreno 530 is the G71.These ones are for lower levels.
  • SquarePeg - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    The Mali G71 MP8 core in the upcoming Huawei Mate 9 is a little faster than the Adreno 530.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/10766/huawei-announc...

    The Kirin 960 SoC in the Mate 9 is built on TSMC's 16nm process. A few recent rumors point to Samsung using a MP16 core version of the Mali G71 built on it's own 10nm process for it's next high end Exynos SoC. Also Samsung will be producing the Qualcomm Snapdragon 830 and that should be packing an Adreno 540. We will know for sure come February as these will be the Soc's in the upcoming Galaxy S8 line.
  • SquarePeg - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    Also, the Mali-G51 should be around Adreno 510 levels of performance.
  • gadgettech - Thursday, July 26, 2018 - link

    i think Mali-G51 is in the level of Adreno 509
  • tuxRoller - Sunday, November 6, 2016 - link

    http://www.gsmarena.com/huawei_mate_9_handson-revi...

    It's not that cut and dry. It's faster on basemark but slower on AnTuTu and gfx.
  • tuxRoller - Sunday, November 6, 2016 - link

    Another data point
    http://www.xda-developers.com/huawei-mate-9kirin-9...

    The g71 looks to be about 85% of an adreno.
    The biggest surprise to me was that the new arm memory controller (and probably also due to the new efficiencies with cache management) is just crazy fast. Twice as fast as the pixel in basically every test.
  • 2literpopcorn - Monday, November 7, 2016 - link

    > "The Mali G71 MP8 core in the upcoming Huawei Mate 9 is a little faster than the Adreno 530."

    Turns out it's not, actually quite a bit slower.

    http://www.xda-developers.com/huawei-mate-9kirin-9...
  • lolipopman - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Expected from MP8 category GPU. MP12 is going to murder Adreno 530 considering it'll be reaching Nvidia Shield levels of performance.
  • jjj - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    Very curious to see how Bitfrost performs in gaming and compute given the major changes it brings.
    Any chance you guys already have the Mate 9 review sample and we see a review at launch in a few days?
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    'VP9 achieving similar quality to HEVC' -- that's a bold statement. Or perhaps ARM means their implementation of the codecs?!
  • tuxRoller - Monday, November 7, 2016 - link

    If memory serves, at the big codec conference a few months back, Netflix released data indicating that hevc averaged 20% efficiency over vp9 BUT that was mostly in the lower res region. So, since Netflix could just deploy vp9 and accept similar results, at low res, to h264 and close results to h265 at high res.
    It's all on the YouTubes if you want to watch the presentation.
  • rrohbeck - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    Will there be open drivers?
  • karthik.hegde - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    Does it continue with the Full system coherency that G71 offered?
  • fanofanand - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    I find it interesting how differently some companies view minimum VR specs vs other companies. GTX 970 is the minimum for Rift, right? The GTX 970 should be far superior to the G51 by orders of magnitude, yet the G51 is designed for VR? I'm sure there is a VR consortium, they need to get their act together and get some standards in place here. Between HDR and VR lack of standardization is harming the ability to gain momentum towards mass adoption.
  • Ariknowsbest - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    They should call it moblieVR for the cheap allinone headsets with PowerVR SGX544 or mali-400/450. The G51 would still be far superior to these solutions, and it would probably work well with Daydream.
  • zodiacfml - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    Dedicated digital cameras will salivate to this kind of processing power. I wonder why even the most expensive digital cameras can't have SoCs of smartphones.
  • Ariknowsbest - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    Probably power constraints, a controller and ASIC is more efficient than a gpu.
  • SydneyBlue120d - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    And still, no smartphone will ever use the HEVC encoder ever.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    And thus VP9...
  • tuxRoller - Sunday, November 6, 2016 - link

    Vp9 is good enough, and vc1 shouldn't be much longer.
  • webdoctors - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    Can someone translate this chip into English? Will it run Crysis?
  • darkich - Wednesday, November 2, 2016 - link

    Well, it could probably run it on low and in 720p.
    It's about as powerful as last generation consoles

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now