Comments Locked

7 Comments

Back to Article

  • Solid State Brain - Monday, June 8, 2015 - link

    Incidentally, I've been recently using the command-line storage benchmarking utility shown in the "Live demo showing SR1020 at 3040MB/s sequential read" photo, and it's a really great tool.
  • Mikemk - Monday, June 8, 2015 - link

    What's the blue apple next to the USB 3.1 drive?
  • Kristian Vättö - Tuesday, June 9, 2015 - link

    Seems to be a blue apple with a light inside to act as a decoration.
  • ClockHound - Monday, June 8, 2015 - link

    "Pricing is TBA, but should be below ADATA's MLC drives, although I was told not to expect dramatic price cuts."

    Wait...what?! So...we take the (un)known risks and reduced performance of MLC and the dramatic savings are passed onto....the vendors? Better margins for them? Higher risk for us? It's like a win-win, except for that 2nd part.
  • MrSpadge - Monday, June 8, 2015 - link

    The NAND cost reduction from TLC us said to be about 30%, as not all parts of the chips can be scaled, overprovsioning has to be increased etc. If this leads to a 20% price reduction I'd be fine with that, at least until the development cost has been refunded.
  • mforce - Tuesday, June 9, 2015 - link

    Sorry but 20% doesn't really sound like a very good deal to me ... but I doubt it will even be 20%. For less than that though TLC really doesn't sound like it's worth it. After all why bother ? For $10 ?
  • Kristian Vättö - Tuesday, June 9, 2015 - link

    For the uneducated a $10 discount can certainly be enough as most people buy solely based on price. I told everyone at Computex that in order for their TLC drives to be successful, the pricing needs to be considerably lower because TLC is inherently worse than MLC and no controller can get around that (lower performance and endurance, higher power consumption), but right now nobody is promising price cuts higher than 5-10%.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now