I hope it gets better and cheaper! But the 128GB version seems to be 3Gbps and it costs about the same as the OCZ Solid 3 / Agility 3 120GB which have much better performance. And I think the 120GB is the sweet spot as long as prices remain above/about 1$/GB. :-9
Ah, my bad, I just noticed that there is an Octane S2 line vs. Octane. I just found the Octane S2 line since I went by price/GB. The Octane S2 is the one similar to the Solid3/Agility3 in price and has SATA Gbps3. But the Octane with SATA Gbps 6 is 20% more expensive. To justify that, you need to really hate SF controllers. :D The Crucial m4 is slightly cheaper (6€) while Samsung 830 is 12€ more expensive. Considering that I thought this controller was supposed to give OCZ more of an edge price-wise, I don't think it has succeeded. :-)
The problem is most of the SSD price is still the flash chips themselves; until that changes the main cost differentiator between controllers on consumer SSDs is the ability to charge more for faster benchmark scores and higher perceived reliability.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
6 Comments
Back to Article
Death666Angel - Monday, January 23, 2012 - link
I hope it gets better and cheaper! But the 128GB version seems to be 3Gbps and it costs about the same as the OCZ Solid 3 / Agility 3 120GB which have much better performance. And I think the 120GB is the sweet spot as long as prices remain above/about 1$/GB. :-9Kristian Vättö - Monday, January 23, 2012 - link
The 128GB version is SATA 6Gb/s as well. At least it's rated for 470MB/s read and 210MB/s write.http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-octane-sata-iii-2...
Death666Angel - Monday, January 23, 2012 - link
Ah, my bad, I just noticed that there is an Octane S2 line vs. Octane. I just found the Octane S2 line since I went by price/GB. The Octane S2 is the one similar to the Solid3/Agility3 in price and has SATA Gbps3. But the Octane with SATA Gbps 6 is 20% more expensive.To justify that, you need to really hate SF controllers. :D The Crucial m4 is slightly cheaper (6€) while Samsung 830 is 12€ more expensive.
Considering that I thought this controller was supposed to give OCZ more of an edge price-wise, I don't think it has succeeded. :-)
DanNeely - Monday, January 23, 2012 - link
The problem is most of the SSD price is still the flash chips themselves; until that changes the main cost differentiator between controllers on consumer SSDs is the ability to charge more for faster benchmark scores and higher perceived reliability.Kristian Vättö - Tuesday, January 24, 2012 - link
Thanks, I have updated the article.gevorg - Saturday, January 28, 2012 - link
I hope OCZ didn't sacrifice reliability to meet these big performance improvements.