So the statements suggesting that the K6-3 is highly competitive in price and highly overclockable, the statement to expect this processor to be a blow to Intel's market share appears to be highly speculative.
I'm curious - did the K6-3 ultimately deal a wicked blow to Intel's market share?
I meant to say the statements suggesting the the K6-3 is highly competitive in price and highly overclockable may be factual, however the statement suggesting this processor will be a blow to Intel's market share appears to be highly speculative.
I'm curious - did the K6-3 ultimately deal a wicked blow to Intel's market share?
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
2 Comments
Back to Article
Remingtonh - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link
So the statements suggesting that the K6-3 is highly competitive in price and highly overclockable, the statement to expect this processor to be a blow to Intel's market share appears to be highly speculative.I'm curious - did the K6-3 ultimately deal a wicked blow to Intel's market share?
Remingtonh - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link
I meant to say the statements suggesting the the K6-3 is highly competitive in price and highly overclockable may be factual, however the statement suggesting this processor will be a blow to Intel's market share appears to be highly speculative.I'm curious - did the K6-3 ultimately deal a wicked blow to Intel's market share?