Aren't the performance numbers too weak for such a beast? Only the 4K random read IOPS are impressive, with the 4K random write and sequential read/writes being very weak. I wonder if these numbers are meant only for 3D QLC NAND.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
3 Comments
Back to Article
Santoval - Monday, August 6, 2018 - link
Aren't the performance numbers too weak for such a beast? Only the 4K random read IOPS are impressive, with the 4K random write and sequential read/writes being very weak. I wonder if these numbers are meant only for 3D QLC NAND.The.Black.Chair - Monday, August 6, 2018 - link
I think the performance number is for U.2 form factor, which is up to four PCIe lanes.Kristian Vättö - Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - link
And enterprise numbers are always steady-state based, which impacts especially random write IOPS.