Perhaps the table should also include the Intrepid 3600 in a different colour to highlight it is the previous generation drive but then a comparison is actually possible?
Why would the endurance for the largest model drop in half? That makes no sense unless they also want to admit they are using lower grade flash for that model.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
10 Comments
Back to Article
Jax Omen - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link
Table compares "Intrepid 3700" and "Intrepid 3800"... Article compares 3700 and 3600?MrCommunistGen - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link
I think that the 3600 is the previous gen model. The 3700 and 3800 are replacements that fit slightly different roles.Kristian Vättö - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link
The 3700 and 3800 are the current models of the Intrepid family, whereas the 3700 superseded the 3600.MrCommunistGen - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link
I think that the 3600 is the previous gen model. The 3700 and 3800 are replacements that fit slightly different roles.MrCommunistGen - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link
gah... this was supposed to be a reply to Jax OmenWardrop - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link
AnandTech comment system needs some definite attention...creed3020 - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link
Perhaps the table should also include the Intrepid 3600 in a different colour to highlight it is the previous generation drive but then a comparison is actually possible?toyotabedzrock - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link
Why would the endurance for the largest model drop in half? That makes no sense unless they also want to admit they are using lower grade flash for that model.RU482 - Friday, March 27, 2015 - link
where can I buy one? I am preparing to run a [albeit strange] endurance test comparing a Micron M600, Intel DC S3610, Samsung PM863.Dug - Monday, March 30, 2015 - link
Dear OCZ. For enterprise drives, please make a SAS interface. Thank you.