They didn't mention offline support for maps/turn-by-turn. Considering Google's recent announcement I think they would've made a point of mentioning it if the feature was there. While Apple's own map product looks great, lacking the offline navigation functionality coming soon to Google's maps puts it a step behind - exactly as Google expected, it would seem.
Can't wait to see both products' 3D maps side-by-side!
Estimates are that Apple paid Google about $100 million for the use of their maps in 2011. I imagine that if that was calculated on the number of iOS devices sold, it would have been a lot more this year.
Even with the purchase of three mapping companies, it's going to cost Apple a lot less to do this themselves going forward.
$100 million over 4 quarters is pocket change for apple. Having control over maps has much more meaning than such a minor amount of money: think service integration, advertising, additional services...
At the end of the day all Apple software is still a vehicle to sell premium hardware at good profit margins... Not sure how getting heavily invested in something like this helps them in the long run.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
11 Comments
Back to Article
Souka - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
Will you need a 4s for this to be even usable? Probably....Knowing Apple..it'll "run" on a 4s...but a iphone 5 will be recommended....
bensulli - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
They didn't mention offline support for maps/turn-by-turn. Considering Google's recent announcement I think they would've made a point of mentioning it if the feature was there. While Apple's own map product looks great, lacking the offline navigation functionality coming soon to Google's maps puts it a step behind - exactly as Google expected, it would seem.Can't wait to see both products' 3D maps side-by-side!
SydneyBlue120d - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
When no direct Apple mapping is availble who is providing the maps? Same old Tele Atlas by TomTom as Google Maps? TnxUpSpin - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
According to older reports they're using OpenStreetMapmelgross - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
Estimates are that Apple paid Google about $100 million for the use of their maps in 2011. I imagine that if that was calculated on the number of iOS devices sold, it would have been a lot more this year.Even with the purchase of three mapping companies, it's going to cost Apple a lot less to do this themselves going forward.
name99 - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
That's not even the most important point.Google's ToS for Maps kept restricting what Apple can do, even as competitors and Android maps are not so restricted.
Obvious examples are
- Apple could not provide turn-by-turn instructions
- Apple could do very limited caching of data
SetiroN - Tuesday, June 12, 2012 - link
$100 million over 4 quarters is pocket change for apple.Having control over maps has much more meaning than such a minor amount of money: think service integration, advertising, additional services...
Impulses - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
Wonder how far they'll go to continue severing ties with Google, and whether it really helps them significantly.Impulses - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
At the end of the day all Apple software is still a vehicle to sell premium hardware at good profit margins... Not sure how getting heavily invested in something like this helps them in the long run.Bateluer - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
Apple invented the Map, after all. Amiright?name99 - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link
Really? You're proud of yourself with that comment?Well done sir. You are truly a master of both wit and business insight.