I'm really confused by this board. It's a nice looking board for sure, but what market is Gigabyte planning to target with this thing? I can't think of any builder who would put an AMD Trinity in their system and pair it with dual GPU's. It just doesn't make sense. You can get better CPU performance for the same money, which is what someone who is planning to use dual GPU's would more than likely choose to do anyway. Not to mention, if you are planning on spending the money for dual GPU's you probably have the extra cash to get a decent CPU.
More than desktops, I am more interested to see Trinity notebooks. In the Computex coverage so far, I have not seen any mention of Trinity notebook announcements :(
totally curious about a uATX Trinity to replace my underwhelming E-350 HTPC or Phenom II X3 705e + Nv GT440 desktop (3D use is pretty much only for LoL and Minecraft) ... would be nice to have just one heat source.
of course REAL gaming would still be done on my i7 ;)
I agree with the posts above concerning full atx fm2/fm1. Trinity (or APUs in general) in anything larger than matx just don't make sense. Unless piledriver shares the same socket/chipset. It just seems very niche to me.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
10 Comments
Back to Article
lunarx3dfx - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
I'm really confused by this board. It's a nice looking board for sure, but what market is Gigabyte planning to target with this thing? I can't think of any builder who would put an AMD Trinity in their system and pair it with dual GPU's. It just doesn't make sense. You can get better CPU performance for the same money, which is what someone who is planning to use dual GPU's would more than likely choose to do anyway. Not to mention, if you are planning on spending the money for dual GPU's you probably have the extra cash to get a decent CPU.Iketh - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
maybe piledriver is clocking extremely well? we'll just have to see...Taft12 - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
But you'd want to use the AM3+ platform (with a new Piledriver CPU) for a high-end system.The whole point of FM2 is the integrated graphics. If you want to be using discrete GPUs, you want the 990FX chipset.
codedivine - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
More than desktops, I am more interested to see Trinity notebooks. In the Computex coverage so far, I have not seen any mention of Trinity notebook announcements :(plonk420 - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
totally curious about a uATX Trinity to replace my underwhelming E-350 HTPC or Phenom II X3 705e + Nv GT440 desktop (3D use is pretty much only for LoL and Minecraft) ... would be nice to have just one heat source.of course REAL gaming would still be done on my i7 ;)
ddrum2000 - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
furthermore I am interested in mini-ITX boardsArnulf - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
"The UP4 clearly has access two at least two ..."should probably say "to at least two" ?
Soulkeeper - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
I agree with the posts above concerning full atx fm2/fm1.Trinity (or APUs in general) in anything larger than matx just don't make sense. Unless piledriver shares the same socket/chipset. It just seems very niche to me.
Assimilator87 - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
Do you guys have any official information about compatibility between FM1 and FM2? Also, how has the pinout changed?Soulkeeper - Monday, June 4, 2012 - link
Everything i've heard since the release of FM1 has said they are incompatible.FM1 was a "deadend" platform from the beginning.
I'd really like to see the APUs share a socket with the desktop/workstation CPUs.
I suppose they have reasons for not doing this.